Overpopulation a reality that is too taboo to discuss?

Simplfied graph of the growth of the population

Overpopulation is a question which is another taboo topic that is in reality a basic key to many of today's problems and a solution to equally as many of them. If it was address objectively without the usual knee jerk reactions which is the norm , or the egocentric motives of many such as the elites. We could get to solutions to many of our problems much faster. Let's have a look at this topic than

The Depopulation bogeymen..

This topic has it's fair share of bogeymen and yes they are sinister and sure the motives of these bogeymen aren't in the interest of  our world but for the individuals themselves. To begin we have the ultra rich agenda for depopulation by the likes of Rockefeller and their likes which serves merely an egocentric agenda of more space for their own group. They don't care for the planet or for the resource waste or any other more objective reasons. They are not even an elite in the words true meaning and they are not worthy of  saving so their motives are purely egocentric. Their motives are counterproductive and will most definitely create a knee jerk reaction that with infuriate people. So wrong people addressing this topic.

The other of the depopulation bogeymen are the eugenicists. For these people a pro white agenda is at it's core and often masked under the quality before quantity packaging, but in reality it's all about white upper class and middle class people before their perceive threat the coloured races. This also is a limited perception of reality and in the long run will equally infuriate the public and make this all a question of elitism and xenophobia. Quality of  people exist in all races and whites are not something extraordinary here. An more equal quality before quantity argument would be more beneficial in the long run. 

The population idealists are another bogeymen category which has another spin on things but equally devastating to the discourse. These people have a techno-optimistic. semi Utopian view of the future where ever growing populations will be handled by ever progressing technology and with the heightening living standards population growth will even out. Well ever higher living standards are the same as higher resource use. More people using western levels of resource use will destroy the planet even faster. Not a realistic option in other words.

Why depopulation and where and how?

We in the west have a resource use equal to that of 100 developing country brethren. We in the west have built up our societies with the aid of cheap abundant oil. Today 1 calorie of food has taken 7 - 10 calories oil to create. With peak oil a reality in our age of time, this lifestyle will not be an sustainable alternative in the future. We are basically consuming ourselves out of a planet. No one can dispute this fact. Depopulation beginning with the most resource intensive populations of the west are most effective. I'm not saying lets stop having children whole sale,  but a one child policy the same as China had could be a beginning. The thing is that this population growth which we have had during the industrial era is an artificial creation due to the dual premises of higher living standard thanks to cheap abundant oil and the advances in modern medicine. The hockey stick graph on population growth is due to this reason. We need a decrease in population for ecological reasons basically so as to be able to continue to exist on this planet. 

Most of the problems today are due to greed from the elites and the overpopulation in the world.  This merchant world view where rabid materialism, endless economical growth and whole sale consumerism is the goal of life has is no future. It's doomed to fail.

The solution a future with smaller populations and other ways of living

With smaller populations there is less competition for resources and the general quality of life is heightened. I personally believe that a crash of this current system is needed before a more balanced and more viable future can arise. There is no need for mass populations. This is needed in mercantile societies where you need to sell wares as to gain riches or you need mass populations to fight your wars. We have progressed out of this and a new leaf in the history of man is being slowly but surely turned. To go into the quality before quantity argument. It's better to have a balanced ecologically sustained population which can truly live for filling lives and develop their potentials for a sounder spiritual goals than this simplistic vulgar materialistic quagmire of mass consumption and low level automation like existence which serves no purpose at all.  A new golden age will require a smaller more sustainable population. How we get there is a question in itself but if we don't we will have ever lowering level of existence for every coming generation. 

This is a question that every sane thinking person must address and not shun. 

The Realist

The taboo of questioning mass imigration to the west

Background to the problem

This is a topic which is taboo in the west. If you even breath the word you are by knee jerk reaction labeled a xenophobe or a racist or basic treated as a semi insane person who in turn is treated as a leaper. I for one respect every person regardless of origin. But this whole sale mass immigration which we have in the west is totally ridiculous. I can understand that there are war zones and areas with repression. But if a person comes as an refugee isn't it logical that you get asylum for the duration of the war or as long as the oppression prevails? Why is it than that people get permanent residence in our countries? Something is wrong with that equation right?.  When you hear immigrants saying that they pay thousands of dollars to refugee smugglers so as to get into the west, something is seriously wrong. I understand that gold diggers and egocentric people exist but when this becomes the norm something is seriously wrong. Media endlessly states that EU border control is too harse and waves their hand to these practices or state that we should feel sorry for these supposed traumatized people. Never can a spade be called a spade. There is always  this endless whitewashing and the whole sale ignoring of these criminal acts by the media and middle classes.

Why is this so?

Than a important question arises why is this mass immigration supported and championed the media and certain elements of the middle class? And why are working class people the only ones reacting to this problem?
You could see some of these middle class people as naive do gooders wanting to help their less fortunate brethren, a honest and good idea though perhaps not so well thought out. But why than is the media championing this you may ask? Here it gets interesting....

With the media you have multiple reasons for their support of mass immigration. Apart from naivete there is a more sinister aspect. The media is sponsored by business and economical powers. But why do they support mass immigration you ask? Well look at it from their perspective. Mass immigration creates competition for low skilled jobs and this means that the western underclasses have to submit to lower pay and ever worsening conditions, which in the long run benefits the business and economic classes.

 Moreover mass immigration puts stress on public housing, forcing forward a private housing sector which benefits the bankers who provide the mortgages. And with  xenophobia rampant in western countries the immigrants have great difficulties obtaining employment which in it's turn puts stress on the welfare systems in the west, which negatively affects the citizens of the western countries themselves. So when you look at this problem from this perspective a new and clearer picture evolves. It's the ruling class which in the long run benefits from all this.

Why is it only the working classes that react to the problem?

Simple answer is that they are the most affected by the negative aspects of mass immigration. They have seen wages go down and benefits which unions worked decades to achieve have been wiped out in a matter of years. They have ample competition for ever fewer low skilled jobs. They have to compete ever harder for ever decreasing public housing with these same immigrants. They have seen their children's schools  becoming negatively affected by lower class migrants, who lack basic understanding or traditions for eduction, making social climbing ever harder benefiting  middle class children with ever less numbers of working class children competing for collage and university positions. So they who are the most affected are also the most vocal.

The problem also is that these working class people lack skills and structures to criticize the situation constructively. In their frustration they resort often to xenophobia, which the media and middle class of course dismisses and manipulates, and reduces or simplifies to be an outcry of mere hate and racism, when in reality the problems are more of a structural nature benefiting these middle class people and the ruling economic classes. This is an important aspect of this that is not addressed in business controlled media. After reading this blog you now know why. It's a pity this isn't more widely known. But understanding the powers behind this it is quite logical that this will remain obscured.

What is the solution?

Well the first and most important thing is to stay a thousand miles away from xenophobia in this question because it is doomed to be fruitless, and you will be ridiculed and dismissed outright. You serve only the corrupt system if you go by this route. The system wants you to fall into the trap because it is so easy to crush. Don't be a victim to this system, stick to facts and evidence of which there is an abundance.

The Only way is to expose the ruling classes agenda is with cold hard facts and showing people that it's NOT a  question of race but purely a question of  manipulation by the ruling classes for their own financial and structural reasons. It's a systematic deception and a cynical manipulation of the lower classes and the more naive part of the middle classes classes using  the migrants themselves. Don't be fooled ever again. Don't be afraid to question this subject. Feel free to share this article.

The Realist